Breaking: Alleged Exxon Hacker-for-Hire Faces Extradition

Jun 30 2025 · Views: 58,991

LONDON, UK — A dramatic ruling in Westminster Magistrates’ Court has cleared the way for the extradition of Amit Forlit, an Israeli private investigator accused of running an illegal hack-for-hire campaign. U.S. prosecutors allege Forlit conducted cyberattacks against 128 targets between 2013 and 2018, potentially earning $16 million for operations linked to ExxonMobil and the lobbying firm DCI Group.

Forlit faces three charges from the U.S. Department of Justice: conspiracy to commit computer hacking, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and wire fraud. If convicted, he could face up to 45 years in prison. Judge John McGarva ruled against Forlit’s arguments opposing extradition, sending the decision to the UK Secretary of State. Forlit’s legal team has vowed to appeal to the High Court and potentially the European Court of Human Rights.

Accusations of Hack-for-Hire

Prosecutors contend Forlit operated as part of a sophisticated hire a hacker scheme, carrying out intrusions on behalf of clients aiming to discredit environmental groups pushing climate litigation against Exxon. Court documents revealed links to lobbying firm DCI Group, although both Exxon and DCI deny involvement. Defense lawyers argued the case was politically motivated, framing the charges as part of a campaign by environmental activists. Prosecutors countered that the allegations are "straightforward criminal" offenses, not political.

Defense and Prison Concerns

Forlit’s team also objected to potential detention in Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center, claiming conditions were unsafe and violated treaty standards. Prosecutors submitted evidence that conditions had improved in the past year. Judge McGarva ultimately rejected the defense arguments, stating the extradition request was based on substantial criminal evidence.

Wider Implications

The case underscores how hackers for hire are no longer confined to dark web forums. Instead, they appear in global investigations with ties to powerful corporations and political interests. Forlit’s alleged role as a high-paid cyber mercenary highlights the risks of the unregulated hack-for-hire economy, where private contractors operate in the gray zone between intelligence gathering and criminal activity.

Kathy Mulvey of the Union of Concerned Scientists, one of the alleged targets, called the ruling “a positive step toward actually getting a full picture of the hacking operation – who hired him and to what end.”

Next Steps

The UK Secretary of State now has two months to certify the extradition request. If certified, Forlit will have 14 days to lodge an appeal. His solicitor, Edward Grange, stated that the case marks only “the beginning of a long road” through appeals and international legal challenges.

The outcome of the Forlit case may set a precedent for how international courts handle hire a hacker allegations tied to corporate power, lobbying networks, and climate change litigation. As governments crack down on hack-for-hire services, the line between private investigation, political warfare, and cybercrime grows ever thinner.